Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 38
Filter
1.
Clin Case Rep ; 11(5): e7362, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20240075

ABSTRACT

Key Clinical Message: Immunosuppression, malnutrition, and underlying infection can unmask obscure infections which can be challenging to identify. Early diagnosis and treatment of infections in immunosuppressed patients are essential due to high morbidity and mortality. Abstract: The immunosuppressive effects of treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), including chronic corticosteroids, anti-TNF agents, and JAK inhibitors, can impact the spread of latent or obscure infections. Clinicians should have a low threshold for pursuing aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic intervention in patients who show signs of clinical deterioration while on immunosuppressing medications. Our unique case highlights an immunosuppressed patient with UC who developed Nocardiosis after initiation of upadacitinib while hospitalized for concurrent UC flare and Clostridium difficile infection.

2.
Applied Sciences (Switzerland) ; 13(7), 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2291589

ABSTRACT

This work is a bibliographic review. The search for the necessary information was carried out in the months of November 2022 and January 2023. The databases used were as follows: Pubmed, Academic Google, Scielo, Scopus, and Cochrane library. Results: In total, 101 articles were selected after a review of 486 articles from databases and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The update on the molecular mechanism of human coronavirus (HCoV) infection was reviewed, describing possible therapeutic targets in the viral response phase. There are different strategies to prevent or hinder the introduction of the viral particle, as well as the replicative mechanism ((protease inhibitors and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)). The second phase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) involves the activation of hyperinflammatory cascades of the host's immune system. It is concluded that there are potential therapeutic targets and drugs under study in different proinflammatory pathways such as hydroxychloroquine, JAK inhibitors, interleukin 1 and 6 inhibitors, and interferons. © 2023 by the authors.

3.
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology ; 17(1) (no pagination), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2256962

ABSTRACT

The world has been rocked by the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which has significantly changed our way of life. Despite the unusual measures taken, COVID-19 still exists and affects people all over the world. A remarkable amount of study has been done to find ways to combat the infection's unsurpassed level. No ground-breaking antiviral agent has yet been introduced to remove COVID-19 and bring about a return to normalcy, even though numerous pharmaceuticals and therapeutic technologies have been reused and discovered. The cytokine storm phenomenon is of utmost importance since fatality is strongly connected with the severity of the disease. This severe inflammatory phenomenon marked by increased amounts of inflammatory mediators can be targeted for saving patients' life. Our analysis demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specifically generates a lot of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and results in lymphocyte exhaustion. Tocilizumab is an IL-6 inhibitor that is currently thought to be both generally safe and effective. Additionally, corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors could be effective and dependable methods to reduce cytokine-mediated storm in SARS-CoV-2 patients.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

4.
Autoimmunity, COVID-19, Post-COVID19 Syndrome and COVID-19 Vaccination ; : 647-672, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2263201

ABSTRACT

Treatment of COVID-19 can be categorized into prophylactic treatment, early-stage treatment, and late-stage treatment. Prophylactic treatment, as either pre or postexposure passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies, is currently limited to high-risk groups, with preexisting risk factors for severe disease and death in case of contracting COVID-19. Additional prophylactic treatment for hospitalized patients includes anticoagulation. In early treatment, when the infectious state is dominant, antiviral agents are used as well as passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies. Late-stage treatment in progressive and-inflammatory disease characterized by a cytokine storm and lung involvement in most severe/critical patients, includes corticosteroids, interluekin-6 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors. Oxygen support is mandatory in severe patients and in patients with moderate to severe adult respiratory distress syndrome and refractory hypoxemia. Rescue procedures include protonation, alveolar recruitment maneuvers, neuromuscular blockade, pulmonary vasodilators, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Additional potential treatments that have not been yet authorized are beyond the scope of this discussion. © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

5.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 973688, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274296

ABSTRACT

Background: JAK (Janus kinases) inhibitors have been proposed as a promising treatment option for the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, the benefits of JAK inhibitors and the optimum thereof for COVID-19 have not been adequately defined. Methods: Databases were searched from their inception dates to 17 June 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Extracted data were analyzed by pairwise and network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the coefficient of mortality. Results: Twenty-eight studies of 8,206 patients were included and assessed qualitatively (modified Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores). A pairwise meta-analysis revealed that JAK inhibitors effectively reduced the mortality (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.46-0.63; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 32%) without increasing the risk of adverse events (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.18; P = 0.79; I 2 = 12%). In a network meta-analysis, clinical efficacy benefits were seen among different types of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, ruxolitinib, and tofacitinib) without the observation of a declined incidence of adverse events. The assessment of rank probabilities indicated that ruxolitinib presented the greatest likelihood of benefits regarding mortality and adverse events. Conclusion: JAK inhibitors appear to be a promising treatment for COVID-19 concerning reducing mortality, and they do not increase the risk of adverse events vs. standard of care. A network meta-analysis suggests that mortality benefits are associated with specific JAK inhibitors, and among these, ruxolitinib presents the greatest likelihood of having benefits for mortality and adverse events. Systematic review registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42022343338].

6.
Clin Chest Med ; 44(2): 299-319, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2271631

ABSTRACT

Morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 is due to severe inflammation and end-organ damage caused by a hyperinflammatory response. Multiple immunomodulatory agents to attenuate this response have been studied. Corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone, have been shown to reduce mortality in hospitalized patients who require supplemental oxygen. Interleukin-6 antagonist, tocilizimab, and Janus kinase inhibitors have also been shown to reduce mortality. However, patients who have severe pulmonary end-organ damage requiring mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appear not to benefit from immunomodulatory therapies. This highlights the importance of appropriate timing to initiate immunomodulatory therapies in the management of severe COVID-19 disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Humans , Immunomodulating Agents , SARS-CoV-2 , Lung
7.
Br J Haematol ; 200(6): 722-730, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251898

ABSTRACT

Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for treating autoimmune disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms, their efficacy in treating other types of cancer has not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated oral ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily) with oral methylprednisolone (40 mg every other day) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease who had received a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, glucocorticosteroids and three or more prior regimens. All of the planned 29 patients had been enrolled with follow-up until 28 April 2022. Median lines of prior therapy were 6 (range 3-12). Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluable in 28 patients; 9 (32%) and 17 (70%) patients showed high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q+, respectively. The overall response rate was 31%. The median duration of response was 13.1 (range 2.8-22.0) months. Median progression-free survival rate was 3.4 (range 0.5-24.6) months, Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The combination of ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone demonstrated significant clinical activity among previously heavily-treated MM patients, and responses were achieved among patients who had high-risk cytogenetics. This is the first clinical study to show activity of JAK inhibitors in combination with steroids for MM patients and expands the potential use of these drugs to those with cancers other than myeloproliferative neoplasms.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone
8.
Immunotherapy ; 14(14): 1149-1164, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2268835

ABSTRACT

In the past decade, the emergence of biologics targeting human cytokine networks has advanced a new era in atopic dermatitis therapy. Dupilumab, in particular, the most widely studied and used IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor, has been considered a milestone in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In addition to the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways, many other cytokines and receptors have been newly targeted as therapeutic options. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the approved and tested biologics and JAK inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, including their advantages and limitations.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Dermatitis, Atopic , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy , Interleukin-13 , Interleukin-4
9.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 13(2): 651-660, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2240892

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) includes cyclosporine and recently approved biologics and small molecules. Among these, upadacitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1, approved for the treatment of severe AD in adolescents/adults. Upadacitinib has shown efficacy and safety in several phase 3 clinical trials, but data on real-life patients are still lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective real-life observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib up to week 16 in a cohort of both bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients. This study was carried out by analyzing the AD database records of an Italian referral hospital. Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, and 35 completed 16 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: At week 16, out of 35 patients, the percentages of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 50, EASI 75, EASI 90 and EASI 100 responses were 94.29, 91.43, 74.29, and 60%, respectively. A decrease of at least 4 points from baseline of itch-NRS was reported by 94.74 and 91.43% of patients at weeks 8 and 16. Regarding the safety of upadacitinib, 26.32% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE), and a total of 13 AEs were recorded, including blood test abnormalities and papulopustular acne. None of our patients interrupted the drug because of an AE. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher rates of EASI75/EASI90/EASI100 responses at week 16, compared with data from clinical trials. The safety profile of upadacitinib was favorable, as no AEs leading to discontinuation were experienced by our patients up to week 16.

10.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(8): 737-752, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243372

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib has emerged as a useful drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). AREAS COVERED: There is an unmet need for cost-effective, non-immunogenic drugs with a safe adverse effect profile to treat patients with ulcerative colitis. In the present review, we evaluate the available literature to inform the appropriate positioning of tofacitinib in the current drug landscape and identify subsets where its use should be done with caution. EXPERT OPINION: Tofacitinib is helpful in the treatment of patients where the standard conventional or biological therapies have failed or were not tolerated. With lower costs of the generic drug than the biologicals (or biosimilars), it could be an important therapy in low- to middle-income countries. The risk of infections, especially Herpes Zoster and tuberculosis, needs to be addressed before initiation. Tofacitinib should be avoided in patients with venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Due to limited evidence, the use is not recommended in pregnancy, while it should be used with caution in elderly citizens. Future trials should look into the head-to-head comparison of tofacitinib with biologicals. The role of tofacitinib in acute severe colitis needs evaluation with comparative trials with current standards of care.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Colitis, Ulcerative , Aged , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Humans , Piperidines , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Pyrroles/adverse effects
12.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 18(3): 253-261, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2212282

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have shown to be highly effective in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. As with all immunomodulatory therapies, careful assessment of any treatment-associated infection risk is essential to inform clinical decision-making. AREAS COVERED: We summarize current literature on infection rates among the licensed JAKi using published phase II/III trial results, post-licensing and registry data. EXPERT OPINION: licensed JAKi show increased risk of infection across the class compared to placebo, most commonly affecting respiratory and urinary tracts, nasopharynx and skin. This risk is dose-dependent. Risks are similar at licensed JAKi doses to that seen with biologic therapies. The risk is compounded by other risk factors for infection, such as age and steroid co-prescription. Herpes zoster reactivation is more common with JAKi compared to other targeted immune modulation, making screening for varicella exposure and vaccination in appropriate cohorts an advisable strategy. Crucially, these small risk increases must be balanced against the known harms (including infection) of uncontrolled autoimmune disease. JAKi are a safe and potentially transformative treatment when used for appropriately selected patients.


Subject(s)
Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects
13.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 961027, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2039687

ABSTRACT

Recent evidence proposed that the severity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients is a consequence of cytokine storm, characterized by increased IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IFN-γ. Hence, managing the cytokine storm by drugs has been suggested for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. Several of the proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 infection recruit a distinct intracellular signaling pathway mediated by JAKs. Consequently, JAK inhibitors, including baricitinib, pacritinib, ruxolitinib, and tofacitinib, may represent an effective therapeutic strategy for controlling the JAK to treat COVID-19. This study indicates the mechanism of cytokine storm and JAK/STAT pathway in COVID-19 as well as the medications used for JAK/STAT inhibitors.

14.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 50(298): 249-252, 2022 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2011302

ABSTRACT

Arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) in COVID-19, similarly as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are observed mainly in severely ill patients. ATE include brain, heart, aortic, and peripheral ischemic complications which usually aggravate a course of the disease leading to lifethreatening conditions. A CASE REPORT: The authors describe a case of a 53-year-old male with Duhring disease in the remission period admitted due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The patient was treated with ceftriaxone (2000 mg once daily), dexamethasone (8 mg once daily), enoxaparin (60 mg twice daily), baricitinib (4 mg once daily), and remdesivir (200 mg on the first day, followed by 100 mg within 4 consecutive days); he required high flow oxygen therapy. On day 5 of hospitalization, he began to suffer from pain of the right lower extremity; in physical examination the limb was cold with absent femoral, popliteal, and pedal pulses. Urgent computed tomography angiography revealed total occlusion of the right superficial femoral artery (SFA) in the absence of any atherosclerotic plaques in the aorta. The patient was intubated and transferred to department of vascular surgery, where a giant clot was removed from SFA. Unfortunately, the patient outcome was unfavorable due to respiratory failure progression. The authors underline that ATE may occur even in anticoagulated patients and that association of some therapeutic options of COVID-19, like janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors use with an increased risk of ATE, should not be excluded.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Dermatitis Herpetiformis , Azetidines , COVID-19/complications , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Purines , Pyrazoles , Sulfonamides
15.
J Cheminform ; 14(1): 16, 2022 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1741956

ABSTRACT

The Janus kinase (JAK) family plays a pivotal role in most cytokine-mediated inflammatory and autoimmune responses via JAK/STAT signaling, and administration of JAK inhibitors is a promising therapeutic strategy for several diseases including COVID-19. However, to screen and design selective JAK inhibitors is a daunting task due to the extremely high homology among four JAK isoforms. In this study, we aimed to simultaneously predict pIC50 values of compounds for all JAK subtypes by constructing an interpretable GNN multitask regression model. The final model performance was positive, with R2 values of 0.96, 0.79 and 0.78 on the training, validation and test sets, respectively. Meanwhile, we calculated and visualized atom weights, followed by the rank sum tests and local mean comparisons to obtain key atoms and substructures that could be fine-tuned to design selective JAK inhibitors. Several successful case studies have demonstrated that our approach is feasible and our model could learn the interactions between proteins and small molecules well, which could provide practitioners with a novel way to discover and design JAK inhibitors with selectivity.

16.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 147: 112614, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1682939

ABSTRACT

Post-Covid pulmonary fibrosis is evident following severe COVID-19. There is an urgent need to identify the cellular and pathophysiological characteristics of chronic lung squeals of Covid-19 for the development of future preventive and/or therapeutic interventions. Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells can mediate local immune protection against infections and cancer. Less beneficially, lung TRM cells cause chronic airway inflammation and fibrosis by stimulating pathologic inflammation. The effects of Janus kinase (JAK), an inducer pathway of cytokine storm, inhibition on acute Covid-19 cases have been previously evaluated. Here, we propose that Tofacitinib by targeting the CD8+ TRM cells could be a potential candidate for the treatment of chronic lung diseases induced by acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lung Injury/drug therapy , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/immunology , Humans , Immunologic Memory/immunology , Lung/immunology , Lung Injury/etiology , Lung Injury/immunology , SARS-CoV-2 , T-Lymphocytes/immunology
17.
Med Lett Drugs Ther ; 63(1637):177-184, 2021.
Article in English | PubMed | ID: covidwho-1651649
18.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 44(8): 587-598, 2021 Oct.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1626213

ABSTRACT

Patients with certain immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have an increased risk of severe infectious diseases than the general population, which are mainly associated with the immunosuppressive treatments that they receive. These treatments act on the immune system through different mechanisms, causing different degrees of immunosuppression and a variable risk depending on whether the pathogen is a virus, bacteria or fungus. This article reviews the most relevant literature on the subject, which was selected and discussed by a panel of experts. The aim of this article is to review the risk of infections in patients with IBD and RA, and the potential preventive measures.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Virus Diseases/prevention & control , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , COVID-19/etiology , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control , Vaccination Coverage , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage
19.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(2)2022 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1625942

ABSTRACT

A cytokine storm is a hyperinflammatory state secondary to the excessive production of cytokines by a deregulated immune system. It manifests clinically as an influenza-like syndrome, which can be complicated by multi-organ failure and coagulopathy, leading, in the most severe cases, even to death. The term cytokine storm was first used in 1993 to describe the graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It was then reused to define the adverse syndromes secondary to the administration of immunostimulating agents, such as anti-CD28 antibodies or bioengineered immune cells, i.e., CAR T-cell therapy. Currently, the concept of cytokine storm has been better elucidated and extended to the pathogenesis of many other conditions, such as sepsis, autoinflammatory disease, primary and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and multicentric Castleman disease. Moreover, cytokine storm has recently emerged as a key aspect in the novel Coronavirus disease 2019, as affected patients show high levels of several key pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IP-10, GM-CSF, MCP-1, and IL-10, some of which also correlate with disease severity. Therefore, since the onset of the pandemic, numerous agents have been tested in the effort to mitigate the cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients, some of which are effective in reducing mortality, especially in critically ill patients, and are now becoming standards of care, such as glucocorticoids or some cytokine inhibitors. However, the challenge is still far from being met, and other therapeutic strategies are being tested in the hope that we can eventually overcome the disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Cytokines , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
20.
J Clin Med ; 10(23)2021 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1542627

ABSTRACT

Although development of biologics has importantly improved the effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), biologic therapies still have several limitations. Effective, low-cost drug therapy with good safety profile and compliance is therefore a substantial unmet medical need. A promising target for IBD treatment strategies are Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, which are small molecules that interact with cytokines implicated in pathogenesis of IBD. In contrast to monoclonal antibodies, which are able to block a single cytokine, JAK inhibitors have the potential to affect multiple cytokine-dependent immune pathways, which may improve the therapeutic response in some IBD patients. Tofacitinib, inhibiting signaling via different types of JAKs, has been already approved for ulcerative colitis, and several other small-molecule are still under investigation. However, one of the main concerns about using JAK inhibitors is the risk of thromboembolic events. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 appear to have an increased susceptibility for immunothrombosis. Therefore, thrombotic complications may become a serious limitation in the use of JAK inhibitors in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. As many questions about safety and efficacy of small molecules still remain unclear, in our review we present the current data regarding approved JAK inhibitors, as well as those in clinical development for the treatment of IBD.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL